GAMES: GameSpot: Best of 2008 | GameFAQs | SportsGamer MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Record labels sue LimeWire
By Jim Welte - MP3.com
August 7, 2006 at 10:39:00 AM | more stories by this author

File-sharing giant had been one of the few peer-to-peer services yet to go under, go legit, or get sued--until now.

LimeWire, one of the few major peer-to-peer (P2P) services to have escaped the music industry's legal wrath to date, was hit with a copyright infringement lawsuit late Friday.

LimeWire CEO Mark Gorton LimeWire CEO Mark Gorton

Given the US Supreme Court's landmark decision regarding P2P services in June 2005, which determined that P2P services could be held liable for copyright infringement, LimeWire likely faces a daunting array of options: Go under, go legit, pay up, or all of the above.

The lawsuit was filed in US District Court in Manhattan by record labels owned by the world's four major record companies--Universal Music, Sony BMG, EMI Group, and Warner Music. It also names LimeWire parent Lime Group LLC as well as chief executive Mark Gorton and chief operating officer Greg Bildson as defendants.

The complaint said the labels were seeking at least $476 million in damages, or $150,000 for each of the more than 3,100 songs allegedly traded illegally on LimeWire, which launched in August 2000.

LimeWire is "devoted essentially to the Internet piracy of plaintiffs' sound recordings," the record companies charge in the suit. "The scope of infringement caused by defendants is staggering."

"Despite numerous efforts to engage LimeWire, the site's corporate owners have shown insufficient interest in developing a legal business model," the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) said in a statement. "While other services have come productively to the table, LimeWire has sat back and continued to reap profits on the backs of the music community. That is unfortunate and has left us no choice but to file a lawsuit to protect the rights and livelihoods of artists, songwriters and record label employees."

That legal business model--filtering illegal files from its network and replacing them with copy-protected, industry-supplied files that users would pay for--has been the choice of many of LimeWire's predecessors in facing the RIAA's wrath.

All of those companies received cease-and-desist letters from RIAA in the wake of the Supreme Court decision last year, as did LimeWire.

To date, iMesh, Kazaa, Mashboxx, Qtrax, and Grokster, one of the two named defendants in the case eventually decided by the Supreme Court, have all paid a settlement and gone the legal route. WinMX has folded, while Bearshare settled for $30 million and folded its assets into iMesh. Streamcast's Morpheus, the other named defendant in the Grokster case, has vowed to keep fighting its case in court. eDonkey remains one of the few major P2P services that has not yet been sued or gone under.

Despite the Supreme Court decision and the moves by most P2P firms to settle up with the RIAA, "Defendants have continued to promote, market, and distribute LimeWire as the successor-in-infringement to these pirate services," the complaint states.

A LimeWire spokeswoman could not be reached for comment.

Back to Today's News »

12 Comments

Oldest First | Newest First
Ik verontschuldig me voor het houden niet omhoog met uw guestbook.
Posted 08/22/2009 12:38am
nice layout, the best
Posted 05/29/2009 4:45pm
C'est le vin qui commence a faire de l'effet.
Posted 05/28/2009 5:15pm
Well here is a simple fact,



as djdisasterpiece said about other Protocols quite rightly.



why should the Programmer(s) / Owners be responsible for other's actions when they have not done anything wrong but provide a Service that was abused by the End Users. as far as i know the P2P Programmers don't host any of the Illgeal Files, the Record Companies have got it all wrong. the end Users should be to blame more than the Programmers.



they may as well Sue all Web Hosting / Free File Upload Services While they are at it for indirectly supporting HTTP, FTP or other Protocols. it's not just P2P that you can get MP3's HTTP and FTP Protocols have been used for years and they haven't been shut down. so why should P2P in this day and age when the technology could be turned and used for good things like streaming videos etc. it ridds the server bandwidth reductions and capping.



it's a negative plus a negative that doesn't actually produce a positive. because it just means people are going to me more inclinded to use or support the Software Companies / Programmers to develop new ways to do these things.



all i can say is they are making life harder for them selfs because it will all go private, using harder and harder forms of encryption, and the truth is it already is.
Posted 08/09/2006 2:45pm
oh snap! well, it was only a matter of time before the labels got to them.
Posted 08/08/2006 9:11pm
wow, didnt see that one coming...
Posted 08/08/2006 7:24pm
yes. it wud be cause their music sucks. no-one will buy music from a crappy artist. sure i download songs all the time, but if i really like it, i will go buy it. i wish they wud leave limewire alone. it's one of the few good sources left. and i am not gonna start using torrents.... =/
Posted 08/08/2006 6:08am
"show me a music artist who is poor, if they are its cause there music sucks"

?
Posted 08/07/2006 8:08pm
recklessdoc it's not the artist that are pushing this but the labels...most major label's screw their artist over with publishing and other things...artist don't really make money off albums sales they make money off tours and endorsments. Anyway record companies are never gonna be able to end piracy and it's a futile effort to try...
Posted 08/07/2006 2:33pm
those guys ruin everything, show me a music artist who is poor, if they are its cause there music sucks, not that we're stealing it, all the hollywood celebs have more than enough money.
Posted 08/07/2006 2:20pm
this is one of the funnist articals about copywrite laws iv read in a while and once again it's the same thing as always. If the RIAA really cared about peoples rights and not money there would be alot of different things happenning. for example there are over millions of FTP clients that you can download "illegal" music off of so why dosn't the RIAA do anything about them? oh yeah, I remeber now. Because they arn't asking for money with there service. The whole reason why the music industry is pissed off and trying to get all these P2P clients shut down is cuz there making money off of there program that "sapposidly" takes the money out of the pockets of "hard working musicians". Here in lies the tragady 1> Any REAL musician wouldn't care if people got there music for free as long as they enjoyed it where as the people "for example Metallica in the Napster case" that complaind about the fact that there music is beeing givin out for free don't really care the about the fact that music is sappost to be a free artform "thats why we have the radio, what is the RIAA ganna do next, sue the radio stations?" 2> Limewire has nothing to due with putting keeping or running ANY files under it's client. Every and All files on Limewire and it's network are files in other peoples computers. There is no Mass Limewire storage account. For example. Lets say someone wanted to get a song but no one currently at that moment had that song that was online. then theye couldn't get that song. where as if someone came online that did. They would have a chance "Not even a garentee" that they could get that song that they would be requsting. and finnaly number 3> Limewire dosn't due anything illigal in any sense of the way. All the limewire is is a chatroom where people can download files in certine folders that useres select that people can download of off. Along with this service they also make it easy for people to find files by putting in what i'd like to call a "@find" system. in other words you can put keywords in a text box and it will comeback with any useres that contain thouse keywords in the names of files that would be selected by other useres that they made for sharring perposes. in turn limewire has nothing to do with the files that are placed on it's P2P account. And if the RIAA id ganna shut down limewire then in a realistic sense that means theyed have to shut down every FTP client. every P2P client, the selling of CD burners would be illigal, and so one and so forth.
Posted 08/07/2006 1:26pm
bummer
Posted 08/07/2006 1:03pm
Sign up now to post a comment!
Click Here

Tags

add
Be the first to tag !
Data Warehouse Clear Gif