Um... what? No! Impossible. Perhaps, but not exactly. Uh, okay. Sure. Right. If you say so. But what if... No. It can't be. But can it? Maybe. Probably not. Then again... Of course not. Ahem. Just a thought. Aha! Exactly! Yeah. Cool. Fantastic. Ah, yes. Indeed. So that's how it is. Mmhmm.

The level of overall ignorance in a show's forum is inversely proportional to the maturity level of the program being discussed (i.e. More mature shows tend to have more mature/intelligent audiences and vice versa.)

Exceptions:

People who are just plain idiots regardless of what they watch on TV.

Intelligent people who just happen to like childish/immature shows.

I notice such drastic differences in intelligence between shows. For example, someone on the Zoey 101 forum refused to believe the rumors that Jamie Lynn Spears is pregnant because she is unmarried and, by his/her logic, should not be able to bear children. Seriously, either people are disregarding TV.com's minimum age requirement (age 13) or society is producing more naive preteens/teenagers.

SAND TACK LAWS DOESNT EXIST?!?!

YOU BASTARDS LIED TO ME! I TRUST NO ONE NOW! AIYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHH!!!!

If any of you are ever down on your luck and find yourselves becoming hobos, you can use this code to communicate with other like individuals.

http://www.slackaction.com/signroll.htm#

Errors: Your HTML is not well-formed - please check for unclosed tags.

What in sam hill is wrong with this site that I can't make spoiler tags, image tags, or URL tags? If that's not bad enough, the site blames me for the fact that it can't process my code. My HTML is PERFECT. There are no unclosed tags. Your face andYO MAMA are not well-formed! That's right - I went there. You aggravate me, TV.com. If you were a person, I'd headbutt you in a second. I only come to this site for the community and the free nachos. Not because this site functions SOOOO wonderfully.