Ridiculous
This is a conversation that should not even be taking place.
Am I the only one who sees that? Am I?
Read the thread.
There are just so many things on this site that need time and attention from the staff. Yet, instead, they are spending their time thinking about how to reinstate voluntarily retired editors.
Why?
Is this really necessary? How many editors will it ~actually~ affect? And is there really an editor who is SO busy that they can't check in once a week? I mean, what... is someone going to move to a mud hut in the middle of the desert where there's no internet? Really?
Even if it's necessary, it certainly isn't more important than fixing the bugs that have infested this site for years.
And that alone makes the conversation ridiculous. It should not be taking place.
More editors need to tell the staff this rather than weighing in with a yes or a no, and their ideas of how to make such a low-priority idea work.
Am I the only one who sees that? Am I?
Read the thread.
There are just so many things on this site that need time and attention from the staff. Yet, instead, they are spending their time thinking about how to reinstate voluntarily retired editors.
Why?
Is this really necessary? How many editors will it ~actually~ affect? And is there really an editor who is SO busy that they can't check in once a week? I mean, what... is someone going to move to a mud hut in the middle of the desert where there's no internet? Really?
Even if it's necessary, it certainly isn't more important than fixing the bugs that have infested this site for years.
And that alone makes the conversation ridiculous. It should not be taking place.
More editors need to tell the staff this rather than weighing in with a yes or a no, and their ideas of how to make such a low-priority idea work.
Print
Comment
Tag
Facebook
Digg this
I'm a little tea-pot. I'm a little bit country, I'm a little bit rock 'n roll. I'm a frayed knot. I am the eye in the sky, looking at you...
Comments